IDR for Neuromonitoring Answers Talk to a specialist

Answers / IONM economics

The economics of IONM arbitration

A No Surprises Act IDR dispute costs each party a $15 administrative fee plus a refundable arbitrator fee of a few hundred dollars, while 2025 median decided awards ran $2,800 to $6,225 per line and cases carry multiple lines. At those stakes, a 15 to 25 percent contingency fee costs more per case than the entire arbitration. Batching same-payer cases within a 30 business day window spreads the fixed fees further.

The stakes per case

A monitored spine case typically bills several lines: evoked potentials, EMG, EEG, and remote supervision. At 2025 medians, the decided lines on one case can add to five figures: $2,800 on the SSEP line, $5,325 on supervision, more if EEG and junction testing ran. Against that, the hard cost of the dispute is a $15 fee and a few hundred refundable dollars. The expected value math in this specialty is not close, which the 165,409 disputes filed in 2025 suggest the industry has noticed.

What a percentage really costs

Contingency pricing grew up when arbitration looked risky. At an 84.7 percent decided win rate and median awards in the thousands, a 20 percent contingency on a $10,000 case award is $2,000 per case, every case, forever. A monitoring company running hundreds of cases a year through the process pays for its vendor many times over. The alternative is flat pricing: Lido IDR charges a flat fee per arbitration regardless of award size, which changes the math most for exactly the high-multiple specialties like IONM.

Batching the surgery schedule

Monitoring cases against the same payer for the same or similar services within a 30 business day window can combine into one dispute. For a group covering several spine programs, that turns a month of cases into a short list of per-payer arbitrations, each carrying one set of fees across many monitored cases. Batching also concentrates the evidence work: one well-built submission on monitoring's clinical value and market rates supports the whole batch.

Where groups lose money anyway

The published record shows disputes dying on process rather than merits: open negotiation started late, the 4 business day initiation window missed, batches assembled after service dates aged out. Each miss is a case that would likely have paid thousands. The discipline is calendar work, tracking payer remittance dates and business-day deadlines per case, and it is the part worth systematizing first, whether in-house or through software built for it.

Run the math on your case volume

Lido IDR batches monitoring cases by payer and files them for a flat fee per arbitration, so the award spread stays with the group. Talk to an IDR specialist.